One Rep Max Calculator
Calculate your one rep max lift weight instantly. Free 1RM calculator for strength training.
Estimated 1 Rep Max
Epley Formula (most common)
126.7 kg
Brzycki Formula
124.2 kg
Lombardi Formula
123.1 kg
Training Percentages (based on Epley 1RM)
Recommended weight and rep ranges for different intensity levels:
| % of 1RM | Weight (kg) | Rep Range |
|---|---|---|
| 95% | 120.3 | 1-2 reps |
| 90% | 114.0 | 3-4 reps |
| 85% | 107.7 | 5-6 reps |
| 80% | 101.3 | 6-8 reps |
| 75% | 95.0 | 8-10 reps |
| 70% | 88.7 | 10-12 reps |
| 65% | 82.3 | 12-15 reps |
| 60% | 76.0 | 15-18 reps |
| 55% | 69.7 | 18-20 reps |
| 50% | 63.3 | 20+ reps |
About the Formulas
Epley
Most commonly used formula. Good balance between simplicity and accuracy. Formula: 1RM = weight x (1 + reps/30)
Brzycki
Tends to give slightly lower estimates than Epley, especially for higher rep ranges.
Lombardi
Uses a power function. Often gives higher estimates for lower rep ranges.
What 1RM Actually Means and Why It Matters
Your one-rep max (1RM) is the heaviest weight you can lift for a single repetition with proper form. Almost every powerlifting and bodybuilding programme references 1RM percentages: '5 sets of 5 at 80%', '3 sets of 8 at 70%' and so on. Without knowing your 1RM, those instructions are guesses. Testing 1RM directly is risky and often pointless for most lifters; estimating it from sub-maximal sets is far safer and almost as accurate.
The calculator takes a recent set you actually completed (e.g. 100 kg for 8 reps) and runs it through three independent formulas to estimate your true 1RM. The formulas are well-validated for the 2 to 10 rep range; above 10 reps the estimates start to drift because muscular endurance starts to dominate over pure strength. For best results, plug in a set you took to failure (or one rep short of it) at between 4 and 8 reps.
The Three Formulas: Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi
The Epley formula (1RM = weight x (1 + reps/30)) is the most common in bodybuilding programmes. It tends to give slightly conservative estimates at low reps and slightly optimistic ones at high reps. Brzycki (1RM = weight x 36 / (37 - reps)) is the powerlifting standard, more accurate at low reps (3 to 6) where the relationship between strength and reps is closest to linear. Lombardi (1RM = weight x reps^0.10) gives a third estimate based on a power-law model.
All three formulas agree closely at 5 reps; they diverge most at 1 rep (where the estimate equals the input weight) and at 12+ reps (where reliability drops). The calculator shows all three so you can see the spread. If they disagree by more than 5 to 10%, your input set was probably too easy or too close to true failure for the formulas to work cleanly. Re-test with a 5 to 8 rep set.
Percentages Table for Programming
The percentages table below your 1RM estimate is the workhorse part of the tool. A 5x5 strength programme calls for 80 to 85%; an 8 to 10 hypertrophy session for 65 to 75%. A heavy single (the 'today's top set' in some programmes) is 90 to 95%. Knowing your 1RM gives you the actual weight to load on the bar, not just a rep target with no anchor.
The table also shows estimated reps achievable at each percentage, which lets you sanity-check the load. If your estimated 1RM says 100 kg and the table says 80% (80 kg) should be good for 6 to 8 reps, but you are only getting 4 reps with form, your real 1RM is lower than the calculator suggests. This is most common with deadlifts, where rep-based estimates over-predict 1RM by 10 to 20% because the deadlift fatigues the central nervous system more aggressively than other lifts.
Why Direct 1RM Testing Is Usually a Bad Idea
Genuinely testing your 1RM is high-risk and high-fatigue. You need a fully warmed-up nervous system, a competent spotter, several attempts to find the true ceiling and significant recovery time afterwards. For competitive powerlifters, this is part of the sport; for everyone else, the marginal accuracy gain over a calculator is not worth the injury risk and the lost training time. A single missed lift can cost you a week of training while you nurse a strain.
Use the calculator instead. Plug in a recent solid set, take the average of the three formulas, and use that as your working 1RM for the next 4 to 6 weeks of programming. Re-test (with a sub-maximal set, not a true 1RM) every 6 to 8 weeks to track progress. The [protein intake calculator](/protein-intake-calculator) and [TDEE calculator](/tdee-calculator) help you set the nutrition side of strength training, which usually limits gains more than the lifting itself.
1RM Percentage Reference
| % of 1RM | Reps achievable | Training purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 95% | 1-2 | Heavy singles (peak strength) |
| 90% | 3-4 | Strength (pure) |
| 85% | 5-6 | Strength (5x5 programmes) |
| 80% | 6-8 | Strength + size |
| 75% | 8-10 | Hypertrophy (size) |
| 70% | 10-12 | Hypertrophy + endurance |
| 65% | 12-15 | Volume work |
| 60% | 15-18 | Endurance / warm-up |
| 50% | 20+ | Technique / metabolic |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which formula is most accurate?
Brzycki is generally the most accurate for the 2 to 6 rep range, especially for big compound lifts (squat, bench, deadlift). Epley is a touch more accurate for upper-body isolation work. Lombardi is the outlier and tends to predict lower than the other two; useful as a conservative estimate. Most strength coaches use Epley as the default because it gives slightly conservative numbers, which is safer for programming. The calculator shows all three so you can pick the one that matches your typical lift profile.
How accurate is a calculated 1RM?
Within 5% for sets in the 3 to 6 rep range, taken to genuine failure or one rep short. Above 10 reps the accuracy drops because the lift becomes more about endurance than strength. The formulas are based on average athletes; if you have unusual fibre composition (predominantly slow-twitch from years of endurance training, for example) your real 1RM may be 5 to 10% lower than the calculator suggests, because you cannot generate quite as much peak force.
Should I use the same 1RM for every lift?
No. Calculate 1RM separately for each main lift. Squat, bench, deadlift, overhead press and barbell row all have different 1RMs, and the relationships between them differ between individuals (some lifters bench more than they squat, others vice versa). For a full training programme, you typically need 1RMs for at least the four main lifts (squat, bench, deadlift, overhead press) and ideally for any other lift you programme by percentage.
How often should I re-test my 1RM?
Every 6 to 8 weeks during a strength-focused training block. More frequent re-testing creates more nervous system fatigue and disrupts your programming. If you are running a long linear progression (Starting Strength, StrongLifts), the working weight is essentially auto-adjusting your 1RM upward each session, so you do not need explicit re-tests; just plug in a new heavy set whenever you want a refreshed number for accessory programming.
Can a beginner use 1RM percentages?
Beginners are usually better served by a linear progression that adds weight every session (e.g. 2.5 kg per week on the squat) rather than percentage-based programming. Percentage programmes assume your 1RM is reasonably stable, which is not true for someone in the first 6 to 12 months of training. Once you can no longer add weight every session and need to start including lighter back-off sets, that is when 1RM-based programming becomes useful.
Related Tools
TDEE Calculator
Calculate your Total Daily Energy Expenditure using the Mifflin-St Jeor equation. Get calorie targets for weight loss, maintenance and gain
Body Fat Calculator
Estimate your body fat percentage using the US Navy method. Shows fat mass, lean mass and body fat category with just a tape measure
Protein Intake Calculator
Calculate your recommended daily protein intake based on your weight, activity level and fitness goals. See food equivalents and per-meal targets