Would You Rather

Discover funny and thought-provoking 'Would You Rather' dilemmas. See what percentage of people chose each option.

Question 1 of 15

Would You Rather...

Fly like an eagle

Swim like a dolphin

How to Play Would You Rather

Each round shows two options. Pick the one you would actually choose, then reveal what percentage of other players picked the same thing. The fun is not in the answer, it is in arguing about why your friend would pick wet socks over damp armpits. The best dilemmas have no obvious right answer; both options are slightly bad, or both are slightly great, and the reveal of the split is the punchline.

Use it as a car-journey game, a dinner-party icebreaker, or a 90-second team meeting opener. Nobody ever loses Would You Rather, which is its main feature. The questions sit roughly 50/50 on average so most arguments are real arguments, not consensus-and-move-on. If you want a sharper version with consequences, switch to [truth or dare](/truth-or-dare) instead.

Why Some Dilemmas Land and Others Flop

A great Would You Rather forces a real trade-off where both options have a clear cost. 'Fly like an eagle vs swim like a dolphin' lands because both are appealing, but each excludes the other forever. 'Eat dirt vs eat soap' flops because everyone picks the same and there is nothing to debate.

The classic structure is a superpower vs a superpower (small but constant vs huge but with a catch), a small annoyance vs a small annoyance (the wet socks family), or a moral coin-flip (save one stranger vs save ten people you do not know). Aim for splits between 35/65 and 50/50; closer to even means more table debate. The percentages on this tool come from a base of player picks, so you will see how your instincts compare to the crowd.

Using It With Different Groups

For a kids' party (ages 5 to 10), stick to physical or food-based dilemmas: 'live in a tree house vs live in a submarine', 'eat broccoli for every meal vs eat ice cream for every meal'. For teenagers, slightly bigger stakes work: 'never use social media vs never watch TV'. For adults, the moral grey-zone questions get the longest discussions: 'be famous but hated vs unknown but loved'.

Drinking-game version: pick the less-popular option and everyone else takes a sip. Roadtrip version: each person makes up the next pair, no Googling allowed. Office icebreaker version: stick to deliberately silly options because no one wants to reveal anything personal in a Monday stand-up. Pair it with [truth or dare](/truth-or-dare) when the group wants to push further than dilemmas allow.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should a round of Would You Rather last?

Five questions takes about 10 minutes if you actually debate each one. Ten questions fits a 30-minute car journey. Beyond 15 in a row and the format wears thin, so break with a different game and come back later. The ratio of debate to question matters more than the count.

Are the answer percentages from real players?

The percentages reflect typical splits drawn from common pollings of these dilemmas. They are accurate to within a few points for the standard set. A few are intentionally lopsided (72/28 on bad teeth vs bad breath) to show that some 'tough' choices have a clear winner once you actually think about it.

Can I make my own Would You Rather questions?

The strongest homemade ones use specific numbers, named places or named people, and force a sacrifice. 'Live in Bristol forever vs live in Edinburgh forever' beats 'live in a city you like vs a city you don't'. Specificity makes the dilemma stick. Write 10 of them in a notes app for your next group dinner; you'll get more mileage than from any pre-made list.

What ages is Would You Rather suitable for?

Six and up for the family-friendly version. The questions on this tool are PG: no graphic, sexual or harmful content. For a younger crowd, lean on physical or food-based dilemmas. For a teen or adult crowd, the moral and lifestyle questions land harder.

More tools β†’